Discuss how your planned assessments meet the key requirements for effective assessments. Reflect on how you might adjust your teaching during your project to allow more student input in the evaluation process.
Throughout the project there are times for students to reflect on their learning and see real-life application with what they are completing in class. Through a daily journal, to relevant readings, to peer assessment, students get to their end goal of creating a master plan for a subdivision and then work to hypothetically sell off the houses within it. I created rubrics for a majority of the pieces so that students can see ahead of time (and throughout the process) how they will be evaluated and can choose which level they would like to achieve. Through these rubrics I tried to keep some criteria open-ended so as not to limit the students creativity and exploration of the topic.
I am not opposed to the idea of student input, but in all honesty I do not know how that could be implemented well with the project. The final piece of the project is the accumulation of the pieces they create throughout their time. One idea is that I could add in collaboration times, if they suggest them, to check for mathematical accuracy and design flaws. I realize I could lead the students to the ultimate criteria through leading questions, but with all the pieces becoming the whole I don’t think they would understand what final outcome should look like. I guess another idea would be to give them the rubric that I created and we have a brainstorming time of how to change it, clarify it, and get it in words that they would fully understand and agree upon.
